Comparative Analysis of ‘Children Who Break the Law’ Development Program in Indonesia and Malaysia

Ridha Husnul Hayati, Rila Rahma Mulyani, Zahratul Azizah, Anggi Firmanjaya Saputra

Abstract


This article aims to compare legal child development programs in Indonesia and Malaysia, the meaning and ages of children, and the basic principles of child protection law in Indonesia and Malaysia. The method used is a comparative study of the legal systems for child protection between Indonesia and Malaysia, as well as the method of analyzing the contents of different references to the topics discussed. There are many similarities when comparing the legal systems for child protection in Indonesia and Malaysia; two legal systems protecting children in each country. Special protection such as care, education, care and adoption, religion and abandoned children and care, rehabilitation, care for children, child protection, investigation, and care or exploitation of children, economically, sexually, educationally, or at school, as well as providing special protection against beatings, disability, and child abuse. The difference is that the protection law in Malaysia has been incorporated into the Child Protection Act 2001 (Tapu 611), whereas in Indonesia it remains separate from the Child Protection Act.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Bahiej. (2013). Pembinaan bagi Anak yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Pencabulan di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Anak (LPA) Kelas II A Kutoarjo.

Aldgate, J., & Stratham, J. (2001). The Children Act Now: messages from research. Stationery Office.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Jamil, F., Mukhaiyar, R., & Husnaini, I. (2020). Kajian Literatur Rekonstruksi Mata Kuliah (Studi Kasus Mata Kuliah Pengolahan Sinyal Teknik Elektro UNP). JTEV (Jurnal Teknik Elektro Dan Vokasional), 6(2), 198–203.

Lickona, T. (2022). Character matters (Persoalan karakter): Bagaimana membantu anak mengembangkan penilaian yang baik, integritas, dan kebajikan penting lainnya. Bumi Aksara.

Lubis, M. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Nakal Berdasarkan Uu Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. JURNAL RETENTUM, 1(01), 15–32.

Mariam. (2008). Upaya Bimbingan Rohani Islam terhadap Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan di Rumah Tahanan Negara Kelas IIB Rangkasitung. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

NASIONAL, B. P. H. (n.d.). Laporan Akhir Pengkajian Hukum Tentang Model Pembinaan Anak Berbasis Pendidikan Layak Anak Dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan.

Nazir, M. (1988). MetodePenelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Nola, L. F. (2017). Upaya Pelindungan Hukum Secara Terpadu Bagi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (Tki)(Integrated Legal Protection For Migrant Workers). Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 7(1), 35–52.

Nurini Aprilianda. (2014). Pengkajian Hukum tentang Model Pembinaan Anak Berbasis Pendidikan Layak Anak dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan.

Ramdani, D., Hidayati, N. O., & Fitria, N. (2017). Gambaran Adversity Quotient Pada Petugas Di LPKA Kelas II Bandung. Jurnal Keperawatan BSI, 5(1).

Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.

Sujadmiko, B., Meutia, I. F., & Heryandi, H. (2021). Model Youth Detention Center Berbasis Indonesian Juvenile Justice System Dan Literacy Skill.

Waworuntu, V. M. (2020). Kajian Yuridis Pembinaan Anak Didik Pada Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas Ii Tomohon Berdasarkan Uu No. 12 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pemasyarakatan. Lex Crimen, 9(3).

Yansah, R. (2022). Kebijakan Formulasi Sistem Pembinaan Anak yang dijatuhi Pidana Penjara (Studi Pasal 20 UU No. 12 Tahun 1995 tentang Pemasyarakatan).

Zubaedi, M. A. (2016). Pengembangan masyarakat: wacana dan praktik. Kencana.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/kolokium.v11i1.578

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.