Effectiveness of an Expert System for Facilities Management in Vocational High Schools

Hade Afriansyah, Ahmad Sabandi, Nurul Widya, Amelia Putri, Indah Cahya Pratiwi, Syariatul Yardha Aisyah, Meiliza Rahma Afrizul, Sonia Putri Melani, Diego Prinanda, Syamsul Mardan

Abstract


Data-driven decision-making regarding school facilities is a crucial element of effective school governance, particularly in vocational high schools (SMK), which require efficiency and accurate information. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of an expert system for managing facilities in vocational high schools, developed as a web-based management information system. This study employs a mixed-methods approach—combining quantitative and qualitative methods—to empirically measure the practicality of the developed product. The study subjects consist of 14 SMK principals in the city of Padang. The quantitative approach was conducted using a questionnaire as the instrument, followed by statistical analysis. Meanwhile, the qualitative approach was conducted through observation and interviews. Based on the results of the quantitative study regarding the effectiveness test, it was found that all indicators—namely usability, technical performance, security, content and information effectiveness, usage efficiency, and user satisfaction—achieved maximum scores. These findings indicate that the Expert System Platform is highly effective; however, this does not imply that the product requires no further development. Qualitative research through interviews revealed that school principals desire the addition of news channels and alumni-specific data, even though the current model has been deemed effective.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abre. (n.d.). K-12 School Dashboard Examples. Retrieved from https://www.abre.io/

Afriansyah, H., Gistituati, N., Irsyad, I., Marsidin, S., Rusdinal, R., Sabandi, A., & Widya, N. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of the All-in-One Dashboard System (AIODS) in enhancing vocational high school management. Data and Metadata, 4, 1159. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20251159

Alkin, M. C. (2011). Evaluation Essentials: From A to Z. Guilford Press.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational Research: An Introduction (4th ed.). Longman.

Alnuaim, A., & Khan, R. (2023). Integration of Information Dashboards for School Leadership Decision-Making. International Journal of Educational Technology.

Alshammari, S., Aldhafiri, M., & Bin Suhail, S. (2021). The Role of EMIS in School Management. Journal of Educational Technology & Society.

Asio, J. M. R., et al. (2022). EMIS Utilization and Administrative Decision-Making. Journal of Educational Research and Practice.

Bold BI. (2021). Education Dashboard Examples. Retrieved from https://www.boldbi.com/

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Element451. (2023). All-in-One Admissions Dashboard. Retrieved from https://element451.com/

EvalCommunity. (n.d.). Decision-Making in Education Management. Retrieved from https://www.evalcommunity.com/

Education to Workforce Indicator Framework. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ed2work.org/

Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.). Pearson.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin Press.

InetSoft. (n.d.). Education Dashboard Software. Retrieved from https://www.inetsoft.com/

ISO. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) – Part 11: Guidance on usability. International Organization for Standardization.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2012). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (12th ed.). Pearson.

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Academic Press.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In J. van den Akker et al. (Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Springer.

OECD. (2023). School Leadership for Learning. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4th ed.). SAGE.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2007). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. SLO.

Pressman, R. S. (2010). Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2018). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Scriven, M. (2007). Key Evaluation Checklist. Western Michigan University.

SEAtS Software. (n.d.). Education Management Dashboards. Retrieved from https://www.seatssoftware.com/

Sharma, S. (2021). The Role of EMIS in Strengthening School Systems. International Journal of Educational Development.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. Psychology Press.

UNESCO IIEP. (n.d.). EMIS for Educational Planning. Retrieved from https://www.iiep.unesco.org/

Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2010). Principles of Information Security (3rd ed.). Cengage Learning.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/kolokium.v14i1.1292

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

https://jurnal.successwithauctions.com/

https://form.gareythethird.com/

https://web.aonevanlines.com/

https://ftd.itsb.ac.id/program-studi/

https://ftd.itsb.ac.id/roadmap-penelitian/

POSTOTO787